705 So. 2d 1381 - JAS v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
1 district · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 2024
1 district · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 477 So. 2d 544 - Winfield v. Div. of Pari-Mutuel Wagering · 551 So. 2d 1186 - In re T.W. · 590 So. 2d 404 - Schmitt v. State · 640 So. 2d 1084 - Jones v. State · B.B. v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[O]ur reasoning in Jones is equally applicable here in recognizing the State's compelling interest in protecting twelve-year-olds from older teenagers and from their own immaturity in choosing to participate in harmful activity.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“any type of sexual conduct involving a child constitutes an intrusion upon the rights of that child, whether or not the child consents ... [therefore] society has a compelling interest in intervening to stop such misconduct.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“sexual activity with a child opens the door to sexual exploitation, physical harm, and sometimes psychological damage.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.