Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 705 So. 2d 262 - Marks v. Jones

705 So. 2d 262 - Marks v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 2016

4 state decisions

20199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 549 So. 2d 840 - Rosell v. Esco · 582 So. 2d 1272 - Martin v. East Jefferson General Hosp. · 591 So. 2d 767 - Iseah v. EA Conway Memorial Hosp. · Iseah v. EA Conway Memorial Hosp. · 669 So. 2d 633 - Roberts v. Cox

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) The degree of knowledge or skill possessed or the degree of care ordinarily exercised by physicians, ... under similar circumstances; and where the defendant practices in a particular specialty and where the alleged acts of medical negligence raise issues peculiar to the particular specialty involved, then the plaintiff has the burden of proving the degree of care ordinarily practiced by physicians ... within the involved medical specialty. (2) That the defendant either lacked this degree of knowledge or skill or failed to use reasonable care and diligence, along with his best judgment in the application of that skill. (3) That as a proximate result of this lack of knowledge or skill or the failure to exercise this degree of care the plaintiff suffered injuries that would not otherwise have been incurred.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.