Bexley v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 528 So. 2d 1159 - Ex Parte State · 565 So. 2d 1255 - Frazier v. City of Montgomery · 568 So. 2d 349 - Fearn v. City of Huntsville · 533 So. 2d 717 - Beals v. State · 491 So. 2d 1053 - Grimes v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"A charge may be amended by order of the court with the consent of the defendant in all cases, except to change the offense or to charge new offenses not contemplated by the original indictment. The court may permit a charge to be amended without the defendant's consent, at any time before verdict or finding, if no additional or different offense is charged and if the substantial rights of the defendant are not prejudiced. "”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“not persuaded by the appellant's claim that he did not have reasonable notice of the charge against him when he proceeded to circuit court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bearden v. State“[t]he appellant has failed to show how his substantial rights were prejudiced by an amendment to the charge against him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bearden v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.