¶1We affirm the trial court’s order without prejudice to the appellant’s refiling the motion with the proper oath signed. See Anderson v. State, 627 So.2d 1170, 1171 (Fla.1993); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(c).
¶2Affirmed.
705 So. 2d 719
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 18, 1998
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1998-02-18
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 2000
1 state decisions
Relies on 627 So. 2d 1170 - Anderson v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1998-02-18
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1We affirm the trial court’s order without prejudice to the appellant’s refiling the motion with the proper oath signed. See Anderson v. State, 627 So.2d 1170, 1171 (Fla.1993); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(c).
¶2Affirmed.