Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 705 SW2D 271 - McQueen v. State

McQueen v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 1993
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Combs v. State · McWherter v. State · Pless v. State · Keen v. State · Martinez v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Our law provides that to be guilty of murder, as alleged in Count 1 of the indictment, the defendant must intend to cause serious bodily injury and, with such intent, commit an act clearly dangerous to human life that causes the death of the deceased. Unless you so find beyond a reasonable doubt thereof, you will acquit the defendant of the alleged offense of murder. (Emphasis added)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.