Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 705 SW2D 820 - Clancy v. Zale Corp.

Clancy v. Zale Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

161
cited by 161 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

161 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 161 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Worsham Steel Co. v. Arias (1992), Golden Eagle Archery, Inc. v. Jackson (2000)

161 state decisions

9001986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 95th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on In Re King's Estate · Angrist v. United States · Turner v. General Motors Corp. · Boatland of Houston, Inc. v. Bailey · Acord v. General Motors Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 161 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Rule 327. For Jury Misconduct [[Image here]] b. A juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of the jury’s deliberations or to the effect of anything upon his or any other juror’s mind or emotions as influencing him to assent to or dissent from the verdict concerning his mental processes in connection therewith, except that a juror may testify whether any outside influence was improperly brought to bear upon any juror. Nor may his affidavit or evidence of any statement by him concerning a matter about which he would be precluded from testifying be received for these purposes. Rule 606. Competency of Juror as a Witness [[Image here]] (b) Inquiry into validity of verdict or indictment. Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or state ment occurring during the course of the jury’s deliberations or to the effect of anything upon his or any other juror’s mind or emotions as influencing him to assent to or dissent from the verdict or indictment or concerning his mental processes in connection therewith, except that a juror may testify whether any outside influence was improperly brought to bear upon any juror. Nor may his affidavit or evidence of any statement by him concerning a matter about which he would be precluded from testifying be received for these purposes.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When the ground of a motion for new trial, supported by affidavit, is misconduct of the jury or of the officer in charge of them, or because of any communication made to the jury or that a juror gave an erroneous or incorrect answer on voir dire examination, the court shall hear evidence thereof from the jury or others in open court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A point of error is multifarious if it embraces more than one specific ground of error, or it attacks several distinct and separate rulings of the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.