Arthur v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2007
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Croley v. Round Mountain Coal Company · Suppinger v. Caplinger · 80 Tex. Crim. 232 - Hill v. State · Chaney v. Chaney · Tresslar Co., Inc. v. Fritts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he intention of the parties must be looked at to determine what interest was conveyed. In determining the intention of the parties, courts look at the whole deed, along with the circumstances surrounding its execution, and courts may also consider the acts of the parties following the conveyance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bradford v. Shepherd
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.