Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 706 F.2d 1 - Costa v. Markey

Costa v. Markey’s Empirical Analysis

706 F.2d 1 · 1982

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
October 2014
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently October 2014

7 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

1401982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody · Dothard v. Rawlinson · Ford Motor Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission · City of Los Angeles Department of Water v. Manhart · Connecticut v. Teal

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Teal teaches that the proper place to evaluate the strength of a Title VII plaintiff’s prima facie case of disparate impact discrimination is the point at which the employer’s neutral criterion has a discriminatory effect. The Court’s focus must be on the first step in the employment process that produces an adverse impact on a group protected by Title VII, not the end result of the employment process as a whole. When it is shown that an employer’s rule disproportionately affects members of a class protected by Title VII, eliminating them from competition for an employment opportunity, the plaintiff establishes a prima facie case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.