United States v. Bachner’s Empirical Analysis
706 F.2d 1121 · 1983
Citation profile
28 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably Russell v. State (1986), United States v. Parr (1983)
28 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3731 · 21 U.S.C. § 963
Relies on Katz v. United States · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Rakas v. Illinois · Jones v. United States · Alderman v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an unrestricted right of occupancy or custody and control of the premises as distinguished from occasional presence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“First, there must be a search and seizure of that individual’s person, house, papers or effects, conducted by an agent of the government; stated differently, there must be an invasion of the claimant’s reasonable expectation of privacy. Second, the challenged search and seizure must be “unreasonable,” as not all searches and seizures are proscribed by the fourth amendment, but only those that are “unreasonable.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.