Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 706 F.2d 1173 - Pines v. Warnaco, Inc.

Pines v. Warnaco, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

706 F.2d 1173 · 1983

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 2016

6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

1001983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on Garber v. United States · Saphir v. Neustadt · Bead Chain Manufacturing Co. v. Saxton Products, Inc. · Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,301 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Spence & Green Chemical Company and Andrew Spence, Sr. · Batter Building Materials Co. v. Kirschner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although [the plaintiff] argues that there was a factual dispute whether he should have discovered the fraud more than a year before filing suit, mere allegations cannot defeat summary judgment. And [the plaintiff] can point to no evidence supporting his allegation that he was prevented from obtaining information [about the fraud].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he 'fact constituting the fraud’ is deemed to have been discovered when it ought to have been discovered; that is, at the time of the discovery of facts which would provoke inquiry by a person of ordinary prudence and which, if followed up, would have led to the discovery of the fraud.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.