United States v. Haimowitz’s Empirical Analysis
706 F.2d 1549 · 1983
Citation profile
50 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently June 2020 · most notably United States v. Williams (2008), United States v. Bervaldi (2000)
50 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Franks v. Delaware · Aguilar v. Texas · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Spinelli v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]nformation which demonstrates a chain of related events covering a broad span of time continuing to the current period may furnish a most reliable indicia [sic] of present activity, thereby clearly demonstrating that probable cause exists for the order to intrude.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]f an affidavit recites activity indicating protracted or continuous conduct, time is of less significance.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the function of a staleness test in the search warrant context is not to create an arbitrary time limitation within which discovered facts must be presented to a magistrate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.