Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 706 F.2d 161 - Raper v. Mintzes

Raper v. Mintzes’s Empirical Analysis

706 F.2d 161 · 1983

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

44 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently August 2014 · most notably Byrd v. Collins (2000), United States v. Moore (1990)

44 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

4301983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Wainwright v. Sykes · Griffin v. California · Lockett v. Ohio · Engle v. Isaac

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “no person ... shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself____”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[w]hether the language used was manifestly intended to be or was of such a character that the jury would naturally and necessarily take it to be a comment on the failure of the accused to testify.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “if the prosecutor argued in the alternative, the federal court may assume that the state court did not rely solely on the merits unless it says so. [Citation omitted.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.