Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 706 F.2d 361 - Silverstein v. Henderson

Silverstein v. Henderson’s Empirical Analysis

706 F.2d 361 · 1983

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2024 · most notably Cone v. Bell (2009), Thomas Garcia v. Hazel Lewis Hale Creek Correctional Facility (1999)

13 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

14019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wainwright v. Sykes · Jackson v. Denno · United States v. Frady · Rose v. Lundy · McCarthy v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is contradictory to argue that a defendant may be incompetent, and yet knowingly or intelligently 'waive' his right to have the court determine his capacity to stand trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “an unsupported or manipulative finding of procedural default would not constitute an adequate state ground barring federal habeas relief”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “conflicting reports, a cold, sparse record, and the recollection of those who saw and dealt with [defendant] ... years ago,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.