Rothman v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis
706 F.2d 407 · 1983
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1381 (§ 1601 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1381A (§ 1602 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1382A (§ 1612 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1382E (§ 1616 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Federal Election Commission v. Machinists Non-Partisan Political League · Buschmann v. Schweiker · Usher v. Schweiker · Jackson v. Schweiker · Kimmes v. Harris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“receipt by an individual of any property or service which he can apply, either directly or by sale or conversion, to meeting his basic needs.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. White v. Shalala · White v. Shalala
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.