Lopez-Vasquez v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
706 F.3d 1072 · 2013
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3607 · 21 U.S.C. § 844 (§ 404 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1255 (§ 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on United States v. Hinkson · 13 Cal. 3d 937 - People v. Orin · Singh v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Hector Tito Lujan-Armendariz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Mauro Roldan-Santoyo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Koerner v. Grigas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Lopez-Vasquez waived his challenge to the BIA's denial of his motion to reopen by failing to argue it in his brief.”), but the majority believes a few scattered references to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[P]ossession for sale is not a first-time simple possession offense that would qualify for treatment under the FFOA.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lopez v. Sessions
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.