Smith v. Hedgpeth’s Empirical Analysis
706 F.3d 1099 · 2013
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blockburger v. United States · Williams v. Taylor · North Carolina v. Pearce · Ring v. Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“consider sentencing enhancements as an element of an offense for purposes of the Double Jeopardy Clause,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Barnes v. Bernini“fairminded jurists could disagree as to the constitutional principle.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Barnes v. Bernini
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.