United States v. Ruby’s Empirical Analysis
706 F.3d 1221 · 2013
Citation profile
8 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3661 (Drug and Alcohol Dependent Offenders Treatment Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Gall v. United States · Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Williams v. People of State of New York · United States v. Kristl
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“subject to a - 18 - different, or higher, level of admissibility than it would be at other types of sentencing procedures. Id. at 1228 . The Ninth Circuit, on the other hand, applies Rule 32.1 to revocation sentencing because the 2005 amendments to Rule 32.1”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“in determining the relevant facts, sentencing judges are not restricted to information that would be admissible at trial. Any information may be considered, so long as it has sufficient indicia of reliability to support its probable accuracy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses (unless the hearing officer specifically finds good cause for not allowing confrontation).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.