Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 706 F.3d 139 - Osterweil v. Bartlett

Osterweil v. Bartlett’s Empirical Analysis

706 F.3d 139 · 2013

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Railroad Commission v. Pullman Co. · Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona · District of Columbia v. Heller · McDonald v. City of Chicago · Brockett v. Spokane Arcades, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) whether the New York Court of Appeals has addressed the issue and, if not, whether the decisions of other New York courts permit us to predict how the Court of Appeals would resolve it; (2) whether the question is of importance to the state and may require value judgments and public policy choices; and (3) whether the certified question is determinative of a claim before us.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Is an applicant who owns a part-time residence in New York but makes his permanent domicile elsewhere eligible for a New York handgun license in the city or county where his part-time residence is located?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “determinative questions of New York law that are involved in a case pending before us for which no controlling precedent of the Court of Appeals exists.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.