Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 706 F.3d 157 - Mandel v. M & Q Packaging Corp.

Mandel v. M & Q Packaging Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

706 F.3d 157 · 2013

Citation profile

102
cited by 102 later decisions
1
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. · Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson · Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 102 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1) the employee suffered intentional discrimination because of his/her sex, 2) the discrimination was severe or pervasive, 3) the discrimination detrimentally affected the plaintiff, 4) the discrimination would detrimentally affect a reasonable person in like circumstances, and 5) the existence of respondeat superior liability.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Minarsky v. Susquehanna Cnty. · In re Tribune Media Co.
  2. “the frequency of the discriminatory conduct; its severity; whether it is physically threatening or humiliating, or a mere offensive utterance; and whether it unreasonably interferes with an employee's work performance.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Macvaugh v. Cnty. of Montgomery · Nuness v. Simon & Schuster, Inc.
  3. “A plaintiff must exhaust all required administrative remedies before bringing a claim for judicial relief.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Macvaugh v. Cnty. of Montgomery · Mahan v. City of Phila.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.