Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 706 F.3d 994 - Jayne v. Sherman

Jayne v. Sherman’s Empirical Analysis

706 F.3d 994 · 2013

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
September 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Summers v. Earth Island Institute · Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission · Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation v. Environmental Protection Agency · California v. Block · Idaho Conservation League v. Mumma

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “he is under threat of suffering 'injury in fact' that is concrete and particularized; the threat must be actual and imminent, not conjectural and hypothetical; it must be fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant; and it must be likely that a favorable judicial decision will prevent or redress the injury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The Court will issue a separate Judgment as required by Rule 58(a).”)); see also Bravo v. City of Santa Maria, 665 F.3d 1076 , 1079 n. 5 (9th Cir.2011). Accord Rainey v. Lipari Foods, Inc., 546 Fed.Appx. 583, 585 (7th Cir.2013) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.