Mrs. W. v. Tirozzi’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1221 (Control of Paperwork Amendments of 1978) · 20 U.S.C. § 1232C · 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975) · 20 U.S.C. § 1411 · 20 U.S.C. § 1412 · 20 U.S.C. § 1415 · 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central School District Bd of Ed Westchester County v. Rowley · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights Organization · Young v. Community Nutrition Institute
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“§ 76.780 A State shall adopt complaint procedures. (a)A State shall adopt written procedures for— (1)Receiving and resolving any complaint that the State or a subgrantee is violating a Federal statute or regulations that apply to a program; (3) Conducting an independent on-site investigation of a complaint if the State determines that an on-site investigation is necessaiy. § 76.781 Minimum complaint procedures. A State shall include the following in its complaint procedures: (a)A time limit of 60 calendar days after the State receives a complaint— (1) If necessary, to carry out an independent on-site investigation; and (2) To resolve the complaint. (b) An extension of the time limit under paragraph (a) of this section only if exceptional circumstances exist with respect to a particular complaint. (c) The right to request the [United States] Secretary [of Education] to review the final decision of the State.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“violation of the State Board's obligation to monitor and ensure compliance with the EHA by state and local educational agencies,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Beth v. Carroll“violation of the [complaint resolution procedures] nor the underlying authorizing statute,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Beth v. Carroll
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.