Burks v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 2010
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Michigan v. Mosley · Cooksey v. State · Oveson v. Municipality of Anchorage · Mallott v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A motion made before trial shall be determined before trial unless the court orders that it be deferred for determination at the trial' of the general issue. Where factual issues are involved in determining a motion to suppress evidence, the court shall state its essential findings on the record.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Davis v. State · Abdullah v. State“operate independently of the elements of the underlying offense”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. West v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.