Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 706 P2D 547 - Coyle v. State

Coyle v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
December 2006
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 2006

13 state decisions

110198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Santobello v. New York · Henderson v. Morgan · King v. State · Board of County Com'rs v. City & Cty. of Denver

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]his brief dialogue falls short of satisfying the requirement of an `appropriate interrogation ... regarding the defendant's past and present mental state... .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) In accepting a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, the court should make such inquiry as may be necessary to satisfy itself that there is a factual basis for the plea. (b) Generally, in determining the accuracy of a plea of guilty, the court may require the defendant to make a detailed statement in the defendant’s own words concerning the commission of the offense to which the defendant is pleading. (c) Whenever a defendant pleads nolo contendere or pleads guilty and simultaneously denies culpability, the court must take special care to make certain that there is a factual basis for the plea. The offer of a defendant to plead guilty should not be refused solely because the defendant refuses to admit culpability. Such a plea may be refused where the court has specific reasons for doing so which are made a matter of record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.