Apache Tank Lines, Inc. v. Cheney’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
1 district · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently February 2014
1 district · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Williams v. Melby · Webster v. Sill · Hall v. Warren · Blackhurst v. Transamerica Insurance Co. · FMA Acceptance Co. v. Leatherby Ins. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(ilt is only when the facts are undisputed and but one reasonable conclusion can be drawn therefrom”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[slummary judgment should be granted with great caution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cross v. Olsen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.