Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 706 SO2D 231 - McGowan v. State

McGowan v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
2
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

56 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently July 2014 · most notably 735 So. 2d 238 - Hughes v. State (1999), 823 So. 2d 473 - Caston v. State (2002)

56 state decisions

340199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Edwards v. Arizona · Santobello v. New York · Fare v. Michael C. · Ricketts v. Adamson · Hutto v. Ross

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]here the trial court has overruled a motion to suppress the confession of a defendant, this Court will reverse the trial court's decision only if the trial court's ruling `is manifestly in error or contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence.'”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Roberson v. State · Edmonds v. State
  2. “It is the rule in this State that where an objection is sustained, and no request is made that the jury be told to disregard the objectionable matter, there is no error.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Walls v. State · 822 So. 2d 984 - Nichols v. State
  3. “This totality-of-the-circumstances approach is adequate to determine whether there has been a waiver even where interrogation of juveniles is involved. We discern no persuasive reasons why any other approach is required where the question is whether a juvenile has waived his rights, as opposed to whether an adult has done so. . . .”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Edmonds v. State · Dancer v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.