Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 706 So. 2d 419 - State v. Hongo

706 So. 2d 419 - State v. Hongo’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably 772 So. 2d 78 - State v. Mitchell (2000), State v. Speed (2009)

44 state decisions

230199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Chapman v. State of California · Bruton v. United States · Arizona v. Fulminante · Sullivan v. Louisiana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether the guilty verdict actually rendered in this trial was surely unattributable to the error.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Hotard · State v. Frinks
  2. “must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Jackson · State v. Causey
  3. “an invalid instruction on the elements of an offense is harmless if the evidence is otherwise sufficient to support the jury's verdict and the jury would have reached the same result if it had never heard the erroneous instruction.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Frinks · State v. Carter

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.