State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably 915 So. 2d 291 - State v. Juniors (2005), 975 So. 2d 753 - State v. Gullette (2008)
35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 523 So. 2d 1305 - State v. Mussall · 603 So. 2d 731 - State v. Hearold · 277 So. 2d 126 - State v. Prieur · 658 So. 2d 683 - State v. Cross
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If it appears that a defendant or the state is prejudiced by a joinder of offenses in an indictment or bill of information or by such joinder for trial together, the court may order separate trials, grant a severance of offenses, or provide whatever other relief justice requires.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lewis · State v. Coston“La. R.S. 14:42, Aggravated rape A. Aggravated rape is a rape committed upon a person sixty-five years of age or older or where the anal, oral, or vaginal sexual intercourse is deemed to be without lawful consent of the victim because it is committed under any one or more of the following circumstances: (1) *** (2) When the victim is prevented from resisting the act by threats of great and immediate bodily harm, accompanied by apparent power of execution. (3) When the victim is prevented from resisting the act because the offender is armed with a dangerous weapon. La. R.S. 14:44, Aggravated kidnapping Aggravated kidnapping is the doing of any of the following acts with the intent thereby to force the victim, or some other person, to give up anything of apparent present or prospective value, or to grant any advantage or immunity, in order to secure a release of the person under the offender's actual or apparent control: (1) The forcible seizing and carrying of any person from one place to another; or (2) *** ; or (3) The imprisoning or forcible secreting of any person. La. R.S. 14:95.1, Possession of a firearm *** by a person convicted of certain felonies A. It is unlawful for any person who has been convicted of a crime of violence as defined in R.S. 14:2(B) which is a felony or simple burglary, burglary of a pharmacy, burglary of an inhabited dwelling, unauthorized entry of an inhabited dwelling, felony illegal use of weapons or dangerous instrumentalities, manufacture or pos”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“This evidence as a whole indicates that the gun was not discharged by accident. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, it the trier of fact could have rationally inferred the specific intent of Defendant from the circumstances of this case and, therefore, could have found that the evidence negated reasonable doubt as to Defendant's intent. Thus, we find that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's conclusion on intent. Assignment of Error Number Two (verbatim): The”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Reed
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.