Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 706 SO2D 503 - Walters v. Rubicon Inc.

Walters v. Rubicon Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 2018

6 state decisions

30199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on White v. Monsanto Co. · 640 So. 2d 237 - City of New Orleans v. Board of Com'rs · 607 So. 2d 532 - Bustamento v. Tucker · 637 So. 2d 127 - Montalvo v. Sondes · Kuebler v. Martin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As noted in White , many intentional infliction of emotional distress cases arise in the employment setting where conduct which is otherwise inactionable can become actionable as `extreme and outrageous' when the offender is in a position of power and authority over the plaintiff. Thus, many of the cases involve circumstances arising in the workplace. White, 585 So.2d at 1209-1210 . However, this proposition is balanced by the notion that the same conduct may be privileged under other employment circumstances so that `disciplinary action and conflict in a pressure-packed workplace environment, although calculated to cause some degree of mental anguish, is not ordinarily actionable.' White, 585 So.2d at 1210 . Hence, workplace conduct amounting to a tort is usually `limited to cases involving a pattern of deliberate, repeated harassment over a period of time.' White, 585 So.2d at 1210 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.