Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 706 SO2D 563 - State v. Barber

State v. Barber’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 2015

8 state decisions

40199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Hudson v. Louisiana · 603 So. 2d 731 - State v. Hearold · Behrens v. Pelletier · 436 So. 2d 471 - State v. Sutton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A. As a matter of right. On its own motion the court may, and on request of a party the court shall, order that the witnesses be excluded from the courtroom or from a place where they can see or hear the proceedings, and refrain from discussing the facts of the case with anyone other than counsel in the case. In the interests of justice, the court may exempt any witness from its order of exclusion. B. Exceptions. This Article does not authorize exclusion of any of the following: * * * (2) A single officer or single employee of a party which is not a natural person designated as its representative or case agent by its attorney.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.