Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

706 So. 2d 942

Docket No. 95-04505.

Dunkin v. State

Thomas DUNKIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1998-03-04

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently August 2001

5 state decisions

Relies on Narvaez v. State · 557 So. 2d 203 - Johnson v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-03-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*943 James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Dale E. Tarpley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

¶3FRANK, Judge.

¶4Thomas Dunkin has challenged the trial court's revocation of his probation on several grounds. We have reviewed the tortured procedural history of these revocation proceedings and have concluded that the trial court properly revoked Dunkin's probation for violation of conditions 1, 2 and 3. The written order, however, does not conform to the oral pronouncement. We remand this case for correction of the written order. See Narvaez v. State,674 So.2d 868 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). Mr. Dunkin need not be present. See Boggs v. State,557 So.2d 203 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

¶5PARKER, C.J., and THREADGILL, J., concur.

/706/so2d/942 · .json · Public domain