Rodwin-Pines v. Pines

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 11, 1998

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1998-03-11

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 2000

2 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“the appellant's failure to file a trial transcript renders the record inadequate to demonstrate reversible error.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 756 So. 2d 193 - Acosta v. Creative Group Investments, Inc.

Relies on 377 So. 2d 1150 - Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-03-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1In the instant case, the appellant asks this Court to resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment was not supported by the evidence. However, the appellant’s failure to file a trial transcript renders the record inadequate to demonstrate reversible error. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979). Because the decision of the trial court has the presumption of correctness and because the appellant has failed in her burden to demonstrate reversible error, Applegate, 377 So.2d at 1152, we affirm the judgment under review.

¶2Affirmed.