Carlin v. Cain’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently October 2015
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 660 So. 2d 1189 - State Ex Rel. Glover v. State · State Ex Rel. Cormier v. State · State Ex Rel. Medford v. Whitley · 685 So. 2d 104 - State Ex Rel. Winn v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“even if exculpatory material was at sometime `knowable,' an application based on it may still qualify under the new facts exception to the time bar, subject to the opportunity provided the State by art. 938.8(B) [sic] to show prejudice arising from the delay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Guidry v. Haney“... facts upon which the claim is predicated were not known to the petitioner or his attorney.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Guidry v. Haney“laches-like provisions of La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.8(B)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.