Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 706 SW2D 265 - State v. Willis

State v. Willis’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
December 1998
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Eickmann v. St. Louis Public Service Co. · State v. Garner · State v. Ralls · Henson v. Kansas City · Wessar v. John Chezik Motors, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is, of course, proper to ask a witness concerning matters testified to by another witness. In no other way could a contradiction be established. It is also true that in framing such a question the prior testimony may be alluded to in order to place the matter before the witness. Despite the foregoing, the particular form of the questions in the circumstances of this ease was not proper. The questions as framed were argumentative and thus upon a proper objection would have been excluded.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.