Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 707 A2D 225 - In Re Harris

In Re Harris’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
May 2021
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 2021

6 state decisions

301997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Falcucci Name Case · 365 Pa. Super. 98 - Matter of Montenegro · M. T. v. J. T. · 245 N.J. Super. 220 - Matter of Eck · Commonwealth v. Goodman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[The court must act in such a way as to 'comport with good sense, common decency and fairness to all concerned and to the public'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “is to prohibit fraud by those trying to avoid financial obligations. This intent is reflected in the penalty provision of the statute, which applies only to ‘person[s] violating the provision of this chapter for the purpose of avoiding payment of taxes or other debts.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.