Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 707 A.2d 234 - Albert v. Albert

Albert v. Albert’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2008
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bryson Properties, XVIII v. Travelers Insurance Co. · Love v. United States · Commonwealth v. Jones · 410 Pa. Super. 146 - Murphy v. Murphy · 418 Pa. Super. 39 - McAuliffe v. McAuliffe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Initially we note that our review from an order awarding support is very narrow. We can reverse a support order only if ■we find that the order cannot be sustained on any valid ground. The decision of the trial court will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion or an error of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is well settled that an appellate court may consider only those facts which have been duly certified in the record on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.