Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 707 A.2d 34 - Dolan v. Williams

Dolan v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Isaksen v. Vermont Castings, Inc. · Demenno/Kerdoon v. United States · Lyell Theatre Corp. v. Loews Corp. · Braxton v. United States · Dominic v. Hess Oil V.I. Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “neglect which might have been the act of a reasonably prudent person under the circumstances”) (internal citation and quotations omitted). Absent such a showing, the deadlines established by this court's January 14, 1999 order must be respected if it is to effectuate 8 Del.C. § 262. Thus Mitchell Partners' post-hoc Sunday Rule theory fails for lack of timeliness as well as on the merits. Second, because I find that Mitchell Partners' demand was not timely submitted, I do not reach Best’s alternative argument challenging the sufficiency of the demand. See 262(d)(2) (a demand is”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “excusable neglect,” requiring a demonstration of”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.