Williamson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Capano v. State (2001), Lopez-Vazquez v. State (2008)
29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Wong Sun v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Davis v. Alaska
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when a writing or recorded statement or part thereof is introduced by a party, an adverse party may require him at that time to introduce any other part or any other writing or recorded statement which ought in fairness to be considered contemporaneously with it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Floudiotis v. State“[w]hen the same conduct of a defendant may establish the commission of more than 1 offense, the defendant may be prosecuted for each offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Parker v. State“established by the proof of the same or less than all the facts required to establish the commission of the”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Parker v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.