Engle v. Koehler’s Empirical Analysis
707 F.2d 241 · 1983
Citation profile
45 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 72 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2005 · most notably Rose v. Clark (1986), 36 Cal. 3d 539 - People v. Garcia (1984)
45 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Sandstrom v. Montana · Cupp v. Naughten · Rideout v. United States · Truong Dinh Hung v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“largely a function of the defense asserted at trial.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“test is whether any 'reasonable juror could have given the presumption conclusive or persuasion-shifting effect.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the law gives us a rule of thumb that a person is presumed to intend the natural consequences of his acts.” (Emphasis omitted.) 707 F.2d at 243 , aff’d, 466 U.S. 1 , 80 L. Ed. 2d 1 , 104 S. Ct. 1673 . And in Carella, the trial court had instructed that the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.