Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

707 F.2d 374

Docket No. 82-5866.

United States v. Nelson

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted April 11, 1983*. Decided May 2, 1983.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1983-05-02

2 counsel of record

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 26 U.S.C. § 4181 · 26 U.S.C. § 5812 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968) · 26 U.S.C. § 5822 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968) · 26 U.S.C. § 5848 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968)

Relies on Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · United States v. Freed · Haynes v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1983-05-02

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2012 · most notably Peretz v. United States (1991), Bonin v. Calderon (1995)

26 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

1601983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Susan Cassell, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Earl T. Durham, San Diego, Cal., for appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Howard B. Turrentine, District Judge, Presiding.

Before ANDERSON, POOLE, and NELSON, Circuit Judges.

J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:

¶1

The real party in interest, Jerry Reeder Bail Bonds, appeals denial of his motion to set aside a bail bond forfeiture and judgment.

¶2

The district court properly considered the appropriate factors and did not abuse his discretion. See United States v. Castaldo, 667 F.2d 20, 21 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 978, 102 S.Ct. 2245, 72 L.Ed.2d 853 (1982).

¶3

The metaphoric reference to "horse race betting" was first suggested by Reeder's counsel, and not, as deceptively stated by Reeder's counsel, the district judge. Counsel must be scrupulously candid and truthful in any matter before the court. Whether the misstatement was negligent or intentional, the result is the same--the potential for misleading the court. 1 ABA Standards for Criminal Justice, Standard 4-1.1(d) and Commentary.

¶4

AFFIRMED.

¶5

Costs are awarded to the government. The mandate shall issue forthwith and no petition for rehearing will be entertained.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for submission on the record and briefs and without oral argument. F.R.App.P. 34(a), Ninth Circuit Rule 3(a)

/707/f2d/374 · .json · Public domain