Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 707 F.2d 775 - Vlastos v. Sumitomo Marine & Fire Insurance

Vlastos v. Sumitomo Marine & Fire Insurance’s Empirical Analysis

707 F.2d 775 · 1983

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
February 2019
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently February 2019

6 federal appellate · 4 district ·

701983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Collister v. Nationwide Life Insurance · Pierce v. Georgia · 230 Pa. Super. 511 - Hionis v. Northern Mutual Insurance · Heist Caribe Corporation v. American Home Assurance Company · Burne v. Franklin Life Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] provision of an insurance policy is ambiguous if reasonably intelligent [persons] on considering it in the context of the entire policy would honestly differ as to its meaning.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In interpreting an insurance policy, which is a contract, courts are required to determine the intent of the parties as disclosed by the language of the policy. ... However, because insurance policies are frequently considered to be contracts of adhesion, any ambiguity in the policy “must be construed against the insurer, and in a manner which is favorable to coverage.” ... Nevertheless, the language of the policy may not be tortured to create ambiguities where none exist.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “whether alternative or more precise language, if used, would have put the matter beyond reasonable question”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.