Koretoff v. Vilsack’s Empirical Analysis
707 F.3d 394 · 2013
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 10 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 7607 · 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 7 U.S.C. § 608C (Food and Agriculture Act of 1965)
Relies on Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation · McKart v. United States · Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency · Functional Music, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“be raised before the agency, not merely the same general legal issue.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A party will normally forfeit an opportunity to challenge an agency rulemaking on a ground that was not first presented to the agency for its initial consideration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“have no obligation to anticipate every conceivable argument about why they might lack such statutory authority.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.