Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 707 F.3d 417 - Burton v. Teleflex Inc.

Burton v. Teleflex Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

707 F.3d 417 · 2013

Citation profile

132
cited by 132 later decisions
2
states following
April 2020
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 29 U.S.C. § 621 (§ 2 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 623 (§ 4 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · Fuentes v. Perskie · Barbara Sheridan v. Ei Dupont De Nemours and Company Jacques Amblard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 132 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A party may move for summary judgment, identifying each claim or defense — or the part of each claim or defense — on which summary judgment is sought. The court shall grant summary judgment if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law...”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “must point to some evidence, direct or circumstantial, from which a factfinder could reasonably either (1) disbelieve the employer's articulated legitimate reasons; or (2) believe that an invidious discriminatory reason was more likely than not a...determinative cause of the employer's action.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “view the facts in the light most favorable to the non-moving party and draw all reasonable inferences in that party's favor.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.