Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 707 FSUPP 652 - Rozumalski v. Pierce

Rozumalski v. Pierce’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
March 1993
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Relies on American Fire & Casualty Co. v. Finn · Thomas v. Shelton · Carl Heck Engineers, Inc. v. Lafourche Parish Police Jury · Gardner & Florence Call Cowles Foundation v. Empire Inc. · 526 F. Supp. 1162 - Luebbe v. Presbyterian Hospital in the City of New York at Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whenever a separate and independent claim or cause of action within the jurisdiction conferred by Section 1331 of this title, [8] is joined with one or more otherwise non-removable claims or causes of action, the entire case may be removed and the district court may determine all issues therein, or, in its discretion, may remand all matters in which State law predominates.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.