Roubideaux v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2011
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Burks v. State · Chaney v. State · Roulston v. State · Driskell v. State · Nauni v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'These cases are indicative of the fact that, rightly or wrongly, 'the courts tend to find distinctive similarities in sex cases more readily than in other situations.' Clearly et al., McCormick on Evidence, § 140, p. 560, n. 20 (1984). See also 2 A.L.R.4th 330 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. James v. State“motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity or absence of mistake or accident,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Lafevers v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.