Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 707 SO2D 122 - State v. Newman

State v. Newman’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 1999
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Faretta v. California · 621 So. 2d 769 - State v. Shelton · Commonwealth Ex Rel. West v. Rundle · 404 So. 2d 1192 - State v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A. In any criminal case, the court shall not accept a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, without first addressing the defendant personally in open court and informing him of, and determining that he understands, all of the following: (1) The nature of the charge to which the plea was offered, the mandatory minimum penalty provided by law, if any, and the maximum possible penalty provided by law.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “to require the trial court to review the penalty section of the statute in question with a defendant in order to obtain a valid guilty plea.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “In any case where a subsequent offense carries an enhanced penalty, the court shall inform the defendant of the penalties for subsequent offenses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.