707 So. 2d 320 - Mendyk v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 2005
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · 622 So. 2d 982 - Huff v. State · 592 So. 2d 1076 - State v. Cerrito · 545 So. 2d 846 - Mendyk v. State · Asay v. Florida Parole Com'n
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n the absence of a showing that such notes or recording may have been made, the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in denying Mendyk's motion in this regard.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.