707 So. 2d 458 - Atchley v. Atchley’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

cited by 11 later decisions

states following

December 2018

most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Roy O. Martin Lumber Co. v. Saint Denis Securities Co. · State ex rel. Ieyoub ex rel. Custom Interiors v. Classic Soft Trim, Inc. · 648 So. 2d 1012 - Zar v. Gaudet · 688 So. 2d 42 - Niemann v. American Gulf Shipping, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“the right of a party to seek redress or a remedy against either [the] plaintiff or defendant in the original action or both, and where those parties have a real interest in opposing it.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 836 So. 2d 274 - In Re Succession of Walker · ASI Fed. Credit Union v. Leotran Armored Sec., LLC
“[A] ‘justiciable right’ as used in interpreting Article 1091 means the right of a party to seek redress or a remedy against either plaintiff or defendant in the original action or both, and where those parties have a real interest in opposing it. If that right does exist, then, in order to intervene it must be so related or connected to the facts or object of the principal action that a judgment on the principal action will have a direct impact on intervenor’s rights. The connexity requirement is essential.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 112 So. 3d 922 - St. Bernard I, LLC v. Williams · 921 So. 2d 1081 - Mangano Consultants v. Bob Dean Enterprises
“A third person having an interest therein may intervene in a pending action to enforce a right related to or connected with the object of the pending action against one or more of the parties thereto by: (1) Joining with plaintiff in demanding the same or similar relief against the defendant; (2) Uniting with defendant in resisting the plaintiff's demand; or (3) Opposing both plaintiff and defendant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 264 So. 3d 554 - Villarrubia v. Villarrubia · 921 So. 2d 1081 - Mangano Consultants v. Bob Dean Enterprises

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.