707 So. 2d 670 - The Florida Bar v. Vining’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 2019
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 656 So. 2d 917 - Stogniew v. McQueen · 662 So. 2d 690 - The Florida Bar v. Clement · 690 So. 2d 1284 - The Florida Bar v. Lecznar · 643 So. 2d 1080 - The Florida Bar v. Rue · 644 So. 2d 504 - City of Miami v. Gilbert
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n officer of the court who knowingly and deliberately seeks to corrupt the legal process can logically expect to be excluded from that process”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“believed respondent acted because he felt he had a legitimate claim to the disputed funds,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.