¶1Reggie Farrior appeals from his judgment and sentence for handling and fondling a child under sixteen years of age. We affirm the judgment and sentence, but strike that portion of probation condition (12) requiring Farrior to pay for drug testing because it was not pronounced orally at sentencing. See Tremaine v. State, 698 So.2d 1385 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). We do not strike probation condition (4) because it did not require oral pronouncement. See Houston v. State, 701 So.2d 372 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).
707 So. 2d 777
Farrior v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 9, 1998
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1998-01-09
Relies on 701 So. 2d 372 - Houston v. State · 698 So. 2d 1385 - Tremaine v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1998-01-09
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently July 2011
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →