Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

707 So. 2d 944

Whiters v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1998-03-18

Decided 1998-03-18

PER CURIAM.

¶1Because appellant has not shown that the actual sentence he received was “illegal” under rule 3.800(a), we affirm the denial of his unverified motion to correct illegal sentence, but without prejudice to his right to file a timely and verified motion under rule 3.850, raising the claims for credit made here.

STONE, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and POLEN, JJ., concur.
/707/so2d/944 · .json · Public domain